Friday, May 22

Guest Post on Spirit21 from David Miliband, Foreign Secretary.

It's Friday today, Jum'ah, and as a special treat, the Foreign Secretary has written his first ever posting on a Muslim blog, here at Spirit21. David Miliband is no stranger to cyberspace and writes his own prolific blog over at the FCO website.

It would be fair to say that the relationship between the Foreign Office and the British and global Muslim community has been a tumultuous one (ahem, understatement), and many Britons, including British Muslims, believe that the Foreign Office needs to be held more strongly to account, and should adopt a more proactive and ethical approach to Foreign policy, working in partnership with Muslims and the Muslim world.

So here is your chance, people: our Foreign Secretary is reaching out and wanting to create dialogue, so take up the opportunity to question him - that's how we create change. I'll be posting my own comments a bit later, but dear readers - grill him, debate with him, criticise him, offer him positive and innovative policy ideas.

Foreign Secretary: here is your opportunity to listen and to make real change. And you should keep going with more direct engagement like this with the electorate - we like it when our elected politicians talk to us directly, really listen, and then make real the aspirations of the people of this nation.


David Miliband: Compromise and coalition of consent required

There is hardly a more important issue than how we build strong coalitions with Muslim majority countries on issues as diverse as non proliferation or climate change, or how we deepen understanding between people of different faiths. This was the theme of my speech yesterday in Oxford.

There is a need for humility in the West but there is also a need for responsibility from all sides rather than finger pointing. No speech can be the end of the matter. The speech focuses on the importance of politics and arenas for politics where compromise and communication are the order of the day. That is why I am grateful for the opportunity to engage through Spirit 21.
There are hard questions left unanswered in my speech and tensions within it. But if Gallup are right that the vast majority of people in Muslim majority countries say they admire the commitment in the West to the rule of law and free speech, but want to see these values consistently applied, then there is more than enough room for all of us to shape common rules for what the Prime Minister calls "the global society". As this morning's FT editorial says, if we are asking the rights questions, then at least we are on our way to getting the right answers.
David Miliband

Labels: , , , , , , ,

11 Comments:

Anonymous OS said...

Link to speech isn't working - try http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/newsroom/latest-news/?view=News&id=18167858

12:55 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With all due respect to the blogger, I'm not sure what the point of the Foreign Secretary's post was. It's a puff paragraph (there are only two) for his speech yesterday.

Nevertheless, the speech itself was instructive, as was the FT Editorial which is referred to by Miliband
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/07787a24-462f-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

Why? Because it talks about engaging Islamists, which is anathema to Islamophobes, the good people at Harry's Place and special advisors at the Department of Communities.

Also worth noting - Miliband falls short of apologising for the Iraq War. And he falls short of acknowledging the failure of his own department, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office and its pointless Islamic affairs unit for losing the Muslim world. Rageh Omar writes a very good piece in yesterday's Evening Standard about this:

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23696253-details/How+Britain+blew+its+chance+with+the+Muslim+world/article.do

Still, we've got to start somewhere, so well done David for denying the Islamophobes and neocons at Harry's Place and the CLG their succour.

2:08 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The team at ENGAGE have posted a detailed response to Miliband's speech.

http://www.iengage.org.uk/component/content/article/349

1:53 pm  
Anonymous Dr Qaisar Rashid said...

Dear David Milliband,
What is the problem with you British? Why don't you stay in your limits?
When I had been to Glasgow, I sent a letter dated 07.09.07 which was addressed basically to the Principal of Uni of Glasgow but a copy was sent to you. The letter is still relevant today and especially in the context of this news item. On the page number 18 of the letter I wrote the following:

1. History of this world is replete with superpowers emerging and disappearing in the mist of time.

2. My understanding is that your people are not valuing the victory of the Second World War but are aggrieved at the loss of supremacy the war brought along with it.

3. May I suggest you to come out of the past and start living in the present? The world has changed around you. The past cannot be imposed on the present.

So, try to play the role commensurate with your size.

Dr Qaisar Rashid
Lahore, Pakistan.

9:21 am  
Blogger PeterP said...

With his money you'd have thought he could afford a decent syrup.

9:09 pm  
Blogger Shelina Zahra Janmohamed said...

Peter - syrup? Did i miss something?

9:19 pm  
Blogger PeterP said...

'Syrup and fig' - Cockney rhyming slang for wig. :)

The worst of it is he probably doesn't have one, just looks like he does!

8:50 pm  
Blogger dawud al-gharib said...

Mr. Miliband, you were also quoted recently in the NYT to the effect: In a recent speech, David Miliband, Britain’s scholarly foreign minister, observed that, in the face of “threats from climate change, terrorism, pandemics and financial crisis,” global security can be guaranteed only by “the broadest possible coalition of states and political movements,” including undemocratic ones. At the same time, he added, “we need the consent of citizens." Please tell skeptical Western muslims, who have observed British and US placations of states, such as Israel, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which oppress and torture muslim and democratic movements (which call sometimes for more Islamic or secular, or democratic and human-rights oriented, governance) - when we see such, why we shouldn't read statements like the above, and note cynically that your participation in blogs such as the above are nothing more than an attempt to 'win' the "consent of citizens" despite the massively undemocratic nature of British relations with the muslim world. (for instance, would you be willing to condemn the British gov's coverup of BAE bribes to Saudi princes, or the fact that such weapons from BAE are not for self-defense of the nation from foreign aggressors, but by the tyrannical Saud family against their own people?) Not to mention the torture devices and training offered to the GCC states, particularly the UAE, or the longstanding effects of 'Operation Ajax', where MI6 and CIA co-operated to remove a democratically elected government in Iran in 1953? When has that policy of deception, pretending an interest in democracy while working to undermine it, ended, pray tell?

Or is this all just 'whitewash' and a distraction, a misdirection that claims that Britain and the US care about Palestinians, just long enough to misdirect the muslim world into accepting an invasion of Iran, whereupon we revert to the status quo of the last 25 years...

at what point do previous Foreign Office lies get called to account?

11:05 pm  
Blogger dawud al-gharib said...

follow-up email desired

11:06 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used to look in on occassions because there would have been something interest and refreshing in a muslim woman's perspective but you columns are just dry, boring, and self-publicising, no different from the attitudes and motives of the uncles who run our mosques.

If you want to read a blog by someone with real passion you should look towards people like suspectpaki.com

10:13 am  
Anonymous mary said...

Where are Miliband's responses?

1:43 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home